<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Marathon on Sunday Evening Review</title><link>https://sundayeveningreview.com/tags/marathon/</link><description>Recent content in Marathon on Sunday Evening Review</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 06:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sundayeveningreview.com/tags/marathon/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Day: Thursday, April 30, 2026</title><link>https://sundayeveningreview.com/today/the-day-april-30-2026/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://sundayeveningreview.com/today/the-day-april-30-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Wednesday that Louisiana&amp;rsquo;s second majority-Black congressional district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, striking down the map and narrowing a central enforcement mechanism of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, &lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/04/in-major-voting-rights-act-case-supreme-court-strikes-down-redistricting-map-challenged-as-racia/">SCOTUSblog reported&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority in Louisiana v. Callais, held that the act didn&amp;rsquo;t require Louisiana to create the additional majority-minority district and that the state therefore lacked a compelling interest to justify its use of race in drawing the map, &lt;a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/29/politics/takeaways-supreme-court-voting-rights-act">CNN reported&lt;/a>. The practical effect: the results test that has been Section 2&amp;rsquo;s primary tool for challenging maps that dilute minority voting strength has been sharply curtailed.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>